Choosing the right technology for a cogeneration power plant is one of the most consequential decisions in modern energy projects. A successful plant can deliver dramatic cost savings and enhance energy resilience, but a poor choice—based on incomplete data—can lead to underperformance and millions in lost value over the system’s lifecycle.
CogenS™ – CHP MFG Selector is a premier technoeconomic modeling tool engineered to eliminate this risk. It empowers engineers and EPC firms to move beyond manufacturer sales pitches and conduct a rigorous, data-driven analysis of potential cogeneration power plant vendors.
CogenS™ platform is far more than a calculator; it’s a sophisticated decision-support engine for designing and optimizing distributed energy resources (DER). It replaces biased, error-prone spreadsheets with a standardized, automated process, allowing you to compare a wide range of CHP technologies—from reciprocating engines and microturbines to fuel cells—in a single, unified environment.
By providing an apples-to-apples comparison of performance, emissions, and financial returns, CogenS™ delivers the clarity needed to make a multimillion-dollar capital decision with absolute confidence.
By combining engineering precision with automation, CogenS™ – MFG Selector ensures that large capital decisions are made with clarity, speed, and objectivity—ultimately helping stakeholders invest in the most cost-effective and technically sound cogeneration power plant system.
CogenS™ is a dedicated module that allows users to run multi-scenario analyses across a range of CHP manufacturers. Using a finite-horizon total investment framework, the tool accepts real-world project inputs to simulate how various systems perform over a 15- to 25-year lifecycle.
The key differentiator is its ability to process multiple CHP configurations in parallel and return a ranked selection of options based on a holistic set of metrics:
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): The complete cost, including CAPEX, OPEX, fuel, and carbon pricing.
Energy and Emissions Savings: Quantify the true environmental and financial benefits.
Financial KPIs: Including Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
Technical Performance: Factoring in degradation, part-load efficiency, and dispatch optimization.
Whether planning a new facility or upgrading an existing cogeneration plant, this tool gives you the transparency to select the best possible system.
Upload your facility's electrical and thermal load profiles, local utility tariffs (including complex rate structures), weather files, and grid outage patterns.
Input the technical data from all CHP vendors under consideration. This includes electrical and thermal efficiency curves, degradation rates, emissions data, ramp rates, part-load behavior, and all capital and operational expenditures.
The tool simulates each manufacturer's system across the entire project lifecycle using consistent conditions, ensuring a fair, data-driven comparison.
Instantly view tabulated results comparing TCO, emissions, financial returns, and more. Identify the most efficient and financially viable system with clarity and confidence.
Load Profiles: Hourly or sub-hourly electrical, heating, and cooling demand data
Tariff Structures: Time-of-use, demand charges, fuel costs, and export rates
Weather Data: TMY or custom climate files for accurate performance simulation
Grid Outage Modeling: Optional for resilience and value-of-lost-load (VoLL) assessments
CHP Manufacturer Specifications:
Electrical and thermal efficiencies at various loads
Degradation rates, ramp rates, and start-up times
Heat recovery configurations (jacket water, exhaust, etc.)
CAPEX and installation cost estimates
O&M cost structure (fixed, variable, per-runtime-hour)
Emissions factors (CO₂, NOₓ, PM)
Performance under multi-unit operation
Up to 15
Total Cost of Ownership (TOC): Lifecycle cost analysis over 10–30 years
Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and Heat (LCOH): Standardized cost-per-output unit
Annual and Cumulative Energy Output: Electrical and thermal energy production
Fuel Consumption and Energy Efficiency: Primary energy use and system conversion efficiency
Operating and Maintenance Costs: Based on duty cycle and degradation
Lifecycle Emissions: CO₂, NOₓ, and optionally SO₂ and methane (CH₄)
Degradation Modeling: Year-by-year performance loss impact
NPV, and Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Comparative Results Table: Summary of all modeled manufacturers and configurations ranked by TOC and emissions
Excel
Available via CogenS™ local install
Why use CogenS™ for your next CHP procurement decision?
Conduct a true lifecycle analysis under your building's realistic operating conditions.
Automate complex, multi-vendor modeling that would take weeks or months to perform in spreadsheets.
Identify the CHP system with the best possible financial return (NPV, IRR) and lowest total cost of ownership.
Eliminate manufacturer bias by comparing all systems under the exact same technical and financial conditions.
Generate professional, data-rich reports that clearly justify procurement decisions to management, investors, and clients.
Make multimillion-dollar decisions with confidence, backed by a complete lifecycle analysis that accounts for all variables.
This modeling platform is built for the key decision-makers in the energy sector who are responsible for large capital investments.
Go beyond basic bids to offer clients a full lifecycle value comparison. Strengthen your proposals and win more projects by demonstrating superior technical and financial rigor.
Make an ironclad business case for CHP upgrades and asset replacement. Justify procurement decisions to CFOs and stakeholders with defensible data.
Conduct a world-class CHP feasibility analysis for your clients. Advise on everything from technology selection to vendor negotiation, backed by robust modeling. The EPA’s CHP Partnership program provides excellent resources that, when combined with CogenS™, create a powerful toolkit for any consultant.
Develop and validate performance contracts with unparalleled accuracy. Model long-term operational costs and revenues to ensure profitability.
Demonstrate TOC competitiveness
The modern energy landscape demands both economic performance and environmental stewardship. CHP systems are a cornerstone of this transition, but their success hinges entirely on proper selection.
A cogeneration power plant—often called a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) system—is recognized by global authorities like the International Energy Agency (IEA) as a key technology for improving energy efficiency. By capturing waste heat, these systems can reach efficiencies of over 80%. Furthermore, as a reliable form of on-site generation, the modern cogeneration power plant is fundamental to microgrid design, providing energy resilience during grid outages.
Every manufacturer claims high efficiency, but real-world performance varies significantly based on operating conditions, maintenance schedules, and part-load demand. A small, 2% difference in efficiency that seems minor on paper can translate into millions of dollars in extra fuel costs over a system’s life. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, a proper CHP feasibility analysis is the most critical step to ensuring project success. CogenS™ provides this analysis by modeling performance against your facility’s actual thermal and electrical load profiles.
The choice of prime mover—be it a natural gas engine, a microturbine, or a hydrogen-ready fuel cell—has massive implications for cost, efficiency, and emissions. Each technology has its ideal application. CogenS™ allows you to model these different technologies head-to-head, helping you determine which is truly optimal for your project’s financial and technical requirements.

Ready to choose the right CHP system for your
cogeneration power plant?
Planning a cogeneration power plant requires precision. Choosing the right CHP manufacturer is critical to maximizing your long-term returns and minimizing operational risk. Download CogenS™ – MFG Selector to compare vendors side by side and select the solution with the lowest total cost of ownership.
A cogeneration power plant — also called a combined heat and power (CHP) system — produces both electricity and thermal energy from a single fuel source, such as natural gas or biogas. By recovering and using the heat that would otherwise be wasted, cogeneration systems achieve efficiency levels of 70% to 90%, far exceeding conventional power plants.
Typical components of a cogeneration power plant include:
Cogeneration power plants are ideal for facilities with continuous thermal demand — like universities, hospitals, and industrial sites — and are a key strategy in microgrid and distributed energy planning.
However, performance varies significantly across manufacturers, making the evaluation phase critical in securing the best economic and environmental outcome.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
You can find more information in our Privacy Policy and Privacy Policy.